Re:Told to remove blog posts describing patented algorithm
by nudge on Thursday July 08, 2010 @08:11AM
(#1497090)
You just keep saying "it has been observed empirically".
Name the drugs.
edit: Also, explain (as I keep asking you to) how it is that the companies are to earn back the money spent on the R&D investments, if there are no patents. You say there is plenty of empirical evidence. Tell me how it is done.
Re:Told to remove blog posts describing patented algorithm
by loup-vaillant on Thursday July 08, 2010 @10:08AM
(#1497358)
Reference for outsiders: my only substantial argument so far is the quote in this comment: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1497246
Your point here is wrong. Unless you can tell why the empirical evidence I speak of is inconclusive or non-existent, I suggest you accept it.