Re:Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo
by weberc2 on Tuesday August 08, 2017 @01:23AM
(#14954654)
It's illegal to fire people over their politics, and that's clearly what happened here.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo
by deong on Tuesday August 08, 2017 @02:12AM
(#14954917)
(1) It's not illegal to fire someone for their politics (it's not one of the enumerated protected classes under federal employment laws anti-discrimination law at least), and (2) it's not "clearly" what happened here -- arguably sure, but there are other ways to see it.
Re:Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo
by gkop on Tuesday August 08, 2017 @03:41AM
(#14955427)
In fact regarding (1) CA state law adds a protected class "Political activities or affiliations", http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/california-employment...
Re:Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo
by weberc2 on Tuesday August 08, 2017 @08:43AM
(#14957192)
Oh shit. You're right; I thought for sure I read otherwise. My mistake. As my sibling commenter notes, it is apparently illegal in CA.
Re:Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo
by greekyogurt21 on Tuesday August 08, 2017 @02:08AM
(#14954906)
Ah yes, I totally forgot that "males are less neurotic and have more drive than females". Silly me. Good luck finding any women to work with you when you spew such nonsense. Aka creating a toxic work place
Re:Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo
by Aunche on Tuesday August 08, 2017 @02:56AM
(#14955163)
Many psychological studies have confirmed psychological differences between men and women. It is not toxic to discuss these findings.
Re:Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo
by weberc2 on Tuesday August 08, 2017 @08:37AM
(#14957125)
It seems like half of this debate is utterly preoccupied with misrepresenting the other half. I guess the social justice position is too weak and it's adherents lacking in integrity.