News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The BitTorrent Protocol Specification v2 by AbacusAvenger on Monday August 07, 2017 @11:19PM (#14953768)
I haven't found any Intel hardware with the SHA extensions actually implemented. I was expecting it in Skylake but apparently that's not the case... Not sure when we can expect to see them.
Re:The BitTorrent Protocol Specification v2 by silotis on Monday August 07, 2017 @11:35PM (#14953901)
Right now the most common x86 CPU which implements the SHA instructions is AMD's Ryzen. The only available Intel CPU which supports them is Goldmont, the latest generation of Atom CPU. It seems likely that Cannon Lake and possibly Coffee Lake will also implement them, but I haven't seen any rumors pointing one way or the other.
Re:The BitTorrent Protocol Specification v2 by mtgx on Tuesday August 08, 2017 @03:02AM (#14955184)
Intel has recently implemented SHA1 in hardware. So give it another decade or so.
Re:The BitTorrent Protocol Specification v2 by ko27 on Tuesday August 08, 2017 @03:49AM (#14955467)
SHA-1 & SHA-256 were both implemented at the same time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_SHA_extensions

Re:The BitTorrent Protocol Specification v2 by baby on Tuesday August 08, 2017 @07:53AM (#14956823)
hopefully SHA-3 (or better, the Keccak permutation) is implemented in hardware first.
Re:The BitTorrent Protocol Specification v2 by snakeanus on Tuesday August 08, 2017 @01:01PM (#14959842)
> SHA-3 (or better, the Keccak permutation)

SHA-3 is just Keccak with specific capacities. If you mean that they should not implement only the standard SHA-3 functions then I agree, having c/raw/SHAKE256 as well would be nice.

Re:The BitTorrent Protocol Specification v2 by baby on Wednesday August 09, 2017 @04:37PM (#14973341)
Implementing the permutation would be even better, because other stuff like Strobe, Keyak, Ketje, etc... could use it.