After the last election, though, I'm done with making predictions :)
He goes on about how things turned out in Malaysia (from more or less unified country to one divided along racial lines due to overblown identity politics). He concludes that one way to combat that is to remove the first-past-the-goalpost-wins political system in the US. Although in his example LKY combats it via authoritarianism. I don't think we want to go down that route.
Even if you want to separate out a modern social justice movement, it certainly dates back decades.
It's fun to consider it in terms of the foundation of the United States and documents like the Declaration of Independence. The wealthy landholders that declared themselves to be free articulated things so clearly that a bunch of other people decided that they wanted in on that shit.
http://www.blackpast.org/perspectives/black-lives-matter-gro...
http://www.socialjusticetoolbox.com/
^ from just the first page of a google search.
I doubt it.
(one of them compares a modern movement to the civil rights movement...)
IMO the meaning of the term has changed. The "social" in the contemporary definition of "social justice" stands for social media. When I see "social justice", I think of people having their careers and personal lives put on trial, and the court is the internet itself.
They should have taken the mature approach and dealt with it more precisely --even if that would have upset a number of people who simply want to see revenge or feel wronged by an opinion.