Re:Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo
by notgood on Monday August 07, 2017 @10:00PM
(#14953041)
...which is true and even google admits they do so to increase female count?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo
by tptacek on Monday August 07, 2017 @10:08PM
(#14953114)
I'm pretty sure Google does not in fact "admit they do [anything] to increase female count".
Re:Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo
by notgood on Monday August 07, 2017 @10:10PM
(#14953134)
Oh they do, a lot:
https://www.blog.google/topics/diversity/focusing-on-diversi...
https://www.wsj.com/articles/tech-firms-borrow-football-play...
https://www.google.com/diversity/
https://qz.com/604723/when-google-increased-paid-maternity-l...
http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/29/technology/google-diversity-...
Re:Google Fires Employee Behind Controversial Diversity Memo
by ubernostrum on Tuesday August 08, 2017 @01:06PM
(#14959897)
The claim made is that they "decreased the false negative rate".
Google has long prided itself on rejecting large numbers of qualified candidates. Since decreasing the false-negative rate inherently means "hire a greater quantity of qualified candidates", I fail to see how the bar was lowered.