On managing outrage in Silicon Valley

Re:On managing outrage in Silicon Valley by ameister14 on Monday August 07, 2017 @08:52PM (#14952593)

Ah, I see. As I understand it, AA usually comes into play when there is little separating two candidates. Most other qualities are the same or the historically advantaged candidate is only slightly better than the disadvantaged one.

To counter this historical disadvantage, the candidate possessing it is given additional 'points' which push them beyond the other. All other things being equal or close to equal, this becomes the tie-breaker.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On managing outrage in Silicon Valley by orlytoss9 on Monday August 07, 2017 @09:18PM (#14952711)

At what point does someone given these AA boosts at every step in their life (high school, SAT, college admission, job interview) no longer qualify to be called disadvantaged?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:On managing outrage in Silicon Valley by RangerScience on Tuesday August 08, 2017 @06:08AM (#14956194)

I got real into AA back in day, when I thought I was on the receiving end of reverse discrimination.

I learned that the biggest part of AA is actually just letting the kids know they qualify. We grow up with the narrative that after highschool you do college; and that you'll succeed at going somewhere. Not everyone gets that narrative, so a big part of AA is finding the kids that qualify for admission / scholarship / etc, and letting them know that. The next part is helping them apply; if no-one you know has ever navigated an academic bureaucracy, it's confusing and intimidating.

It's like the Black Panthers. Everyone knows about the least of their efforts (police watch), because it's also the most controversial. Few people know about the bulk of their efforts (school lunches) because it's not.

[ Parent | on HN ]