News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SF residents get a shock: Someone bought their street by npsimons on Monday August 07, 2017 @01:21PM (#14949216)
> They have added no value, they're not looking to add value.

Which is basically property ownership/landlordship in a nutshell. Not that I'm disagreeing with you, just pointing out it's something we accept all the time already.

Re:SF residents get a shock: Someone bought their street by resu_nimda on Monday August 07, 2017 @01:42PM (#14949426)
Yes but not all landlords are the same. Some put time and effort into maintaining the property and making improvements. I would consider that adding value.

Like everything else, there's a spectrum, and I find the couple described in the article to be on the extreme "slumlord" end, except even more obnoxious because they are masquerading as nice gentle good samaritans.

Re:SF residents get a shock: Someone bought their street by icebraining on Monday August 07, 2017 @02:37PM (#14950019)
Why do you assume they won't be putting time and effort into maintaining the property and making improvements?

In fact, they already did, by paying the debts of the property.

Re:SF residents get a shock: Someone bought their street by namlem on Monday August 07, 2017 @06:16PM (#14951710)
Owning land never adds value. Owning a building can add value if you maintain and improve it.