News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Torvalds: I've pulled this, but if problems, ext4 is goin... by nathancahill on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:24PM (#14943634)
Re:Torvalds: I've pulled this, but if problems, ext4 is goin... by Kiro on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:25PM (#14943642)
What's the problem?
Re:Torvalds: I've pulled this, but if problems, ext4 is goin... by ilkkao on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:41PM (#14943738)
Only clear bug fixes are wanted at this point to make the next release candidate(s) as small as possible. In this case, the PR contained some cleanups.

More changes can mean more regressions. The goal is to stabilize the master branch so that v4.13 can be released.

Re:Torvalds: I've pulled this, but if problems, ext4 is goin... by koenigdavidmj on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:28PM (#14943667)
Some of these are large changes that are recent enough that it's impossible to vet them to Linus' standards.
Re:Torvalds: I've pulled this, but if problems, ext4 is goin... by xorcist on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:19PM (#14943992)
4.13 is due for release probably this week. Linus cut -rc3 a week ago, which was small, and nothing serious have been heard. Normally only critical fixes would be merged this late which might warrant another rc, but this is Ted T'so, a wizard who has been involved in Linux since before it had networking, so his opinions have merit.
Re:Torvalds: I've pulled this, but if problems, ext4 is goin... by tytso on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:39PM (#14944101)
In general we always get to -rc6 to -rc8 before we do a release, with perhaps -rc7 being the most common. Since the merge window (before -rc1) is two weeks, this translates to a two month release cycle. So using a time-based release cycle paradigm, -rc3 isn't _that_ late, although as I acknowledged in another comment in this thread, it was a bit marginal.

(And by the way it's "Ts'o", but the wrong spelling is all over the Internet at this point.)