News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by FRex on Sunday August 06, 2017 @04:54AM (#14940493)
I see, schrödinger companies. The answer to a question (that isn't any company secret but a simple question) is totally different depending on you being a client vs. being a journalist.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by StavrosK on Sunday August 06, 2017 @09:51AM (#14941308)
I don't so much see the answer as being totally different as I see the amount of effort going into the answer varying wildly.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by thanksgiving on Sunday August 06, 2017 @10:26AM (#14941447)
Should Consumer Review disclose the fact that they will review the car when they buy a car from a dealership?
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by StavrosK on Monday August 07, 2017 @07:28AM (#14946691)
The author didn't review the service, he basically assumed many things about the inner workings and didn't give the company a chance to clarify.

Consumer Review doesn't have to disclose the fact that they will review a car when they buy it from a dealership, but they probably should ask GM to comment when they say "it seems to us, without having driven one or heard from anyone who has driven one, that GM are making their cars so they explode on impact".

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by thanksgiving on Tuesday August 08, 2017 @06:44AM (#14956402)
> Consumer Review doesn't have to disclose the fact that they will review a car when they buy it from a dealership, but they probably should ask GM to comment when they say "it seems to us, without having driven one or heard from anyone who has driven one, that GM are making their cars so they explode on impact".

Do they have to disclose that they are Consumer Review when they talk to GM?