News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How Amazon bought and killed PlanetAll, an early Facebook... by stickfigure on Saturday August 05, 2017 @11:26PM (#14939501)
The problem with Friendster is that one feature wouldn't scale, and it's not obvious that Amazon would have been able to scale it either. Some problems don't scale in linear.

The founder of Friendster believed that the "degrees of bacon" chain was a critical feature. That chain is incredibly expensive to calculate for very large graphs, and produced multi-second page loads. In retrospect, the obvious answer is "drop that feature"; Facebook does fine without it. But Friendster product management thought it was the secret sauce... and maybe it was a reasonable thing to think back in 2002? Dunno, but it sank the company.

Most of what I know about Friendster comes from their #3 and #6 employees (friends).

Re:How Amazon bought and killed PlanetAll, an early Facebook... by skinnymuch on Sunday August 06, 2017 @12:58PM (#14942110)
How did those early employees make out financially? If it's personal, no problem, no need to answer. Always interesting to know how early employees end up doing from a specific startup or overall.
Re:How Amazon bought and killed PlanetAll, an early Facebook... by stickfigure on Tuesday August 08, 2017 @02:48AM (#14955121)
Financially, they ended up with nothing but their paychecks.
Re:How Amazon bought and killed PlanetAll, an early Facebook... by scarface74 on Sunday August 06, 2017 @09:15AM (#14941164)
The Startup podcast did mention that as one of their biggest issues. I didn't know that technically that was their biggest issue.
Re:How Amazon bought and killed PlanetAll, an early Facebook... by stordoff on Monday August 07, 2017 @05:05AM (#14946163)
Doesn't LinkedIn currently compute a similar n-degree of separation metric, or am I conflating two different features?