Re:Martin Shkreli is found guilty of securities fraud
by emodendroket on Friday August 04, 2017 @03:57PM
(#14931638)
But judges are infallible and thus so are bench trials?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Martin Shkreli is found guilty of securities fraud
by austenallred on Friday August 04, 2017 @04:04PM
(#14931725)
Um no one said or even implied either of those things
Re:Martin Shkreli is found guilty of securities fraud
by emodendroket on Friday August 04, 2017 @04:06PM
(#14931744)
It does seem to be implied if you are invoking human fallibility to bolster an argument that jury trials are bad.
Re:Martin Shkreli is found guilty of securities fraud
by austenallred on Friday August 04, 2017 @04:09PM
(#14931769)
How does jury trials being imperfect imply that bench trials are perfect? A being true does not mean B is false...
Re:Martin Shkreli is found guilty of securities fraud
by emodendroket on Friday August 04, 2017 @04:11PM
(#14931788)
The OP was saying that bench trials are much better, not just that jury trials are flawed.
Re:Martin Shkreli is found guilty of securities fraud
by austenallred on Friday August 04, 2017 @04:18PM
(#14931869)
better != perfect
Re:Martin Shkreli is found guilty of securities fraud
by emodendroket on Friday August 04, 2017 @04:42PM
(#14932068)
OK, so the argument is that regular people are... more fallible than a judge? I don't understand what you want to say at this point.
Re:Martin Shkreli is found guilty of securities fraud
by Clubber on Friday August 04, 2017 @04:09PM
(#14931774)
Judges are either appointed or elected, both equates to judges being political creatures.
Re:Martin Shkreli is found guilty of securities fraud
by emodendroket on Friday August 04, 2017 @04:42PM
(#14932070)
It's a rhetorical question.