News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Snopes.com prevails in tentative court ruling over finances, ownership. Parent comment

Re:Snopes.com prevails in tentative court ruling over financ... by kyberias on Friday August 04, 2017 @03:53AM (#14927096)
But OP wrote: "ex-spouse (who had no direct participation in the startup)" => woman didn't contribute. Even though she did.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Snopes.com prevails in tentative court ruling over financ... by matthewmacleod on Friday August 04, 2017 @04:01AM (#14927130)
My interpretation of that was the more charitable “hey, this made me think about divorce generally”. I can see how it could be interpreted otherwise though.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Snopes.com prevails in tentative court ruling over financ... by ClassyJacket on Friday August 04, 2017 @04:14AM (#14927177)
That's still you saying that an ex spouse that didn't contribute can only possibly be a woman.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Snopes.com prevails in tentative court ruling over financ... by tangus on Friday August 04, 2017 @04:25AM (#14927211)
Come on. The spouse in this case is a woman. Ok, OP already said s/he wasn't referring to this case, it "just made him/her think about divorce generally". Let's leave it already.
[ Parent | on HN ]