News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bitcoin Exchange Had Too Many Bitcoins by rrdharan on Wednesday August 02, 2017 @10:26PM (#14916483)
Short selling is an incredibly important piece of any reasonable stock exchange. It also dates back to 1609 so it's not exactly a new technological innovation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_(finance)

Re:Bitcoin Exchange Had Too Many Bitcoins by Twisell on Wednesday August 02, 2017 @11:10PM (#14916678)
From the very article you reffered to me :

Short sellers were blamed for the Wall Street Crash of 1929.[15] Regulations governing short selling were implemented in the United States in 1929 and in 1940.[citation needed] Political fallout from the 1929 crash led Congress to enact a law banning short sellers from selling shares during a downtick; this was known as the uptick rule, and this was in effect until 3 July 2007 when it was removed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC Release No. 34-55970).

So one is actually entitled to wonder if regulations are not needed. While the article fail to explain categorically in which way it is "incredibly important".

Re:Bitcoin Exchange Had Too Many Bitcoins by mikeash on Thursday August 03, 2017 @10:05AM (#14919646)
There's a really big difference between blaming short sellers for the crash, and short sellers actually being the cause for the crash. Short sellers got blamed, but weren't necessarily at fault. There's a further implication that the crash is the cause for the Great Depression, which is likewise fairly unfounded.
Re:Bitcoin Exchange Had Too Many Bitcoins by notyourday on Thursday August 03, 2017 @08:22AM (#14918885)
If there was short selling that could have been blamed for the crash of 1929 it was what is known as a naked short selling. Since non-market making short selling now requires having a locate, it is impossible to sell short more shares that one can reasonably borrow.