Re:NSA Unlawfully Surveiled Kim Dotcom in New Zealand
by willstrafach on Wednesday August 02, 2017 @11:37AM
(#14911384)
> The call for proof on individual cases is, of course, a valid one
In this context though, it is because the headline indicates that it is a proven fact. However, it is not, it is an assumption directly from Dotcom. I think there would be no issue if it were more clearly stated as an allegation.
In this context though, it is because the headline indicates that it is a proven fact. However, it is not, it is an assumption directly from Dotcom. I think there would be no issue if it were more clearly stated as an allegation.