News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Is Amazon's cloud service too big to fail?. Parent comment

Re:Is Amazon's cloud service too big to fail? by unkown-unknowns on Wednesday August 02, 2017 @04:14AM (#14908804)
There are some open source implementations of parts of the APIs of cloud providers that might help someone a bit when trying to migrate. For example, Minio [1] [2] implements the AWS S3 v4 API.

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12392081

[2]: https://minio.io/

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Is Amazon's cloud service too big to fail? by dsandip on Wednesday August 02, 2017 @07:10AM (#14909589)
We[1] have seen a fair number of requests for managed services as devs claim that "we don't have the time or skills to maintain these open source components" (quoting verbatim from a request on Intercom). I don't think this is about having open source substitutes in all the cases. Personally not a fan of how/where the build vs. buy debate is playing out here.

[1]: https://hasura.io

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Is Amazon's cloud service too big to fail? by patta54 on Wednesday August 02, 2017 @02:10PM (#14913128)
"we don't have the time or skills to maintain these open source components" translates to "we don't want to install a monitoring solution that restarts a service when it fails, or think about design in regard to component failure".

It's such a poor argument. I was a developer long before AWS appeared and I've used so many open sources packages that were profoundly reliable. In many cases it just takes a daemon restart. And while it's not exciting to set up some of that stuff, it's far more tolerable than writing a CloudFormation template.

[ Parent | on HN ]