News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Erlang on the JVM. Parent comment

Re:Erlang on the JVM by tyweir on Tuesday July 06, 2010 @09:06AM (#1490832)
I'm puzzled why you would question the motivation of porting erlang to run atop the JVM.

Just because you don't like erlang syntax and would prefer to have ruby on top of BEAM, doesn't mean that others should not undertake this port.

Rather than question erjang, why not start your ruby/BEAM port?

Edit: better grammar.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Erlang on the JVM by dublinclontarf on Tuesday July 06, 2010 @11:12AM (#1491192)
I'm sorry but I really dislike Erlangs syntax more than I like it's concurrency. I'm not saying Erlangs bad just that I hate how it looks.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Erlang on the JVM by lukev on Tuesday July 06, 2010 @01:23PM (#1491625)
Maybe others don't share your opinions.

Just a thought.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Erlang on the JVM by dublinclontarf on Tuesday July 06, 2010 @03:09PM (#1492010)
Probably not, they're not based on any form of logic.
[ Parent | on HN ]