Re:Race to discover Planet Nine using astronomy and new comp...
by fooker on Monday July 31, 2017 @10:48PM
(#14897565)
What do you define as a planet though?
If you consider our sun a frame of reference, you might find that technically some far away objects bigger than the sun have complex periodical movements around the sun.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Race to discover Planet Nine using astronomy and new comp...
by sand500 on Monday July 31, 2017 @11:40PM
(#14897736)
Well the definition that removed pluto from being a planet is this:
Re:Race to discover Planet Nine using astronomy and new comp...
by kkylin on Tuesday August 01, 2017 @03:08AM
(#14898467)
I think that's an interesting question, but the search being described is for a fairly specific kind of object with constrained parameters: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Nine
Re:Race to discover Planet Nine using astronomy and new comp...
by flukus on Monday July 31, 2017 @11:21PM
(#14897671)
I'm pretty sure the definition would include having the sun as the major gravitational force acting on the object.
Re:Race to discover Planet Nine using astronomy and new comp...
by devrandomguy on Monday July 31, 2017 @11:18PM
(#14897661)
Are you suggesting that the galaxy revolves around the sun? Heresy!
Re:Race to discover Planet Nine using astronomy and new comp...
by fooker on Wednesday August 02, 2017 @10:31AM
(#14910842)
I am going to become a flat-galaxier!
Re:Race to discover Planet Nine using astronomy and new comp...
by autokad on Tuesday August 01, 2017 @10:17AM
(#14900829)
definition of a planet as follows: a planet is what ever arbitrary metrics Brown can come up with that demotes Pluto and includes the other 8 (sort of) so that he can write papers / gain fame / etc. They didn't come up with criteria and found Pluto didn't fit, they kept coming up with criteria UNTIL Pluto didn't fit and the other planets did fit.
Brown has no army over me, and I don't buy into the academic nonsense. Pluto is a planet.