News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scientists Edge Closer To Lab Test For Chronic Fatigue Sy... by taneq on Monday July 31, 2017 @10:06PM (#14897377)
> No, that is a gross overgeneralisation and not true of any condition.

Bullshit. Anyone with a scientific background and a vested interest in studying a specific uncommon disease will likely know more about it than most GPs. General Practitioners are just that - generalists. They know the basics, plus enough to refer patients to an appropriate specialist. It's unreasonable to expect them to be well versed in every single obscure condition that a new patient could possibly have, and it's a naive appeal to authority to state that they automatically "know better" due to having a medical degree.

Re:Scientists Edge Closer To Lab Test For Chronic Fatigue Sy... by inopinatus on Monday July 31, 2017 @10:15PM (#14897419)
> Anyone with a scientific background and a vested interest in studying a specific uncommon disease

You totally missed my point there, which was rebutting that patients "often know better", which is just plain crap.

Re:Scientists Edge Closer To Lab Test For Chronic Fatigue Sy... by Mz on Monday July 31, 2017 @10:19PM (#14897430)
You are "rebutting" things that haven't been said by anyone. And then insisting you are right.

Here is what I actually said, which you intentionally misquoted and are now twisting into something else entirely:

For some conditions, the patients themselves are often better informed than general MDs. Only actual specialists in the condition really know more

Re:Scientists Edge Closer To Lab Test For Chronic Fatigue Sy... by inopinatus on Monday July 31, 2017 @10:37PM (#14897530)
And that is not so except for a very small minority of presentations. If you'd said "very occasionally" rather than "often" I might agree. Everyone else is simply pretending to a much higher level of expertise than they possess.