News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scientists Edge Closer To Lab Test For Chronic Fatigue Sy... by inopinatus on Monday July 31, 2017 @08:24PM (#14897001)
If it's a matter of degree, then here's my take on your remark.

Your comment has not merely crossed the line into "I-know-better"-land, it is days into that territory, is lost without a map, is desperately looking for water and shelter, but is still having terrible trouble admitting to itself that it might have made a horrible mistake.

> Let's say, for example, that you, as a patient, have been reading the literature on inflammatory systems and have become convinced that

Uh-oh.

> PhD has a very convincing scientific case

That is the point where your physician had to stifle a giggle, I'm afraid.

> Why should you, as the patient, have to get the approval of a physician to go through with it

You don't. If you can perform the procedure on yourself, it's perfectly legal.

Re:Scientists Edge Closer To Lab Test For Chronic Fatigue Sy... by tomhoward on Tuesday August 01, 2017 @02:45AM (#14898389)
Uh-oh.

That is the point where your physician had to stifle a giggle, I'm afraid.

People who are sincerely and humbly committed to seeking truth on a topic, don't make sneering comments like this.

Re:Scientists Edge Closer To Lab Test For Chronic Fatigue Sy... by maxerickson on Monday July 31, 2017 @09:25PM (#14897234)
Did they edit their comment to say "treatment" instead of "procedure"?

Because there's lots of things that fall under treatment that have pretty effective legal gatekeeping around them.

Re:Scientists Edge Closer To Lab Test For Chronic Fatigue Sy... by Mz on Monday July 31, 2017 @09:30PM (#14897257)
I don't believe so. Inopinatus has wildly misquoted me and others here.
Re:Scientists Edge Closer To Lab Test For Chronic Fatigue Sy... by inopinatus on Monday July 31, 2017 @10:18PM (#14897427)
When I quote someone, I put it in "quote marks", or > italic.