Out of all major energy sources, nuclear is the safest

Re:Out of all major energy sources, nuclear is the safest by AdamJacobMuller on Monday July 31, 2017 @04:01PM (#14895402)

> Some of the recently-touted small reactor designs try to omit a containment vessel on the grounds that their design couldn't possibly melt down. That's probably not a good approach.

Agreed, but, fail-safe and walkaway-safe designs coupled with moderate containment vessels seem like a good medium. It is all about mitigating risk. I don't think we should ever accept that a design has actual 0 risk for meltdown, but, if you design with a goal of having 0 risk of uncontained failures and then design containment for a moderate level of failure, that seems like you have a robust overall solution.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Out of all major energy sources, nuclear is the safest by rtx on Monday July 31, 2017 @04:26PM (#14895605)

Even if there is a meltdown it will have localized environmental impact. Which will self correct in few centuries. Greenhouse gases are affecting the whole planet, same with minerals for batteries.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Out of all major energy sources, nuclear is the safest by contravariant on Monday July 31, 2017 @04:51PM (#14895790)

>design containment for a moderate level of failure

What on earth does this mean? When would an (as of yet) uncontained failure be considered moderate?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Out of all major energy sources, nuclear is the safest by godelski on Monday July 31, 2017 @05:54PM (#14896222)

In a nuclear disaster case, it isn't nothing or Chernobyl. Like all things in life, there is stuff between the extremes.

[ Parent | on HN ]