Reddit raises $200M at a $1.8B valuation

Re:Reddit raises $200M at a $1.8B valuation by accountyaccount on Monday July 31, 2017 @03:03PM (#14894960)

Most major redesigns end up being a mistake. It's cool that they're re-writing, but they should change things for users in an iterative way or they're going to get extreme backlash. People do not respond well to drastic change to the point where even quantifiable positive change is often met with complaints.

It could very well be superior, but the moment someone says "like Facebook" about any sort of newsfeed the response will essentially be "BURN THE WITCH"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reddit raises $200M at a $1.8B valuation by sloppycee on Monday July 31, 2017 @04:51PM (#14895789)

Honest question, why is it cool that they're re-writing?

To me this signals that the company has stagnated, or has grown beyond technology; it's an engineering team with no new ideas, no innovation, that's desperately trying to remain relevant in a company that is becoming less and less about the technology.

That's just my experience, but think about it. If a company has other revenue streams they can capture using new tech, how could they justify a rewrite vs. developing that new tech?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reddit raises $200M at a $1.8B valuation by accountyaccount on Monday July 31, 2017 @10:45PM (#14897550)

A lot has changed since they started, I imagine it's a nice "if you had to start all over again how would you do it differently" moment. A lot of companies don't really get that chance, hence: cool.

Now, maybe it's completely wrong for them and they shouldn't be — that's a totally fair assessment. I honestly don't know.

[ Parent | on HN ]