News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Disk Performance: Linode vs. Slicehost by carbocation on Monday July 05, 2010 @05:11PM (#1489116)
Not only that, but it's also out-of-date; Linode now has one-click backups, in contrast to what this blog post claims (though it was correct when written back in Dec 2009).
Re:Disk Performance: Linode vs. Slicehost by weaksauce on Monday July 05, 2010 @05:41PM (#1489174)
they are file based backups and not snapshot backups.

from: http://www.linode.com/backups/

Files that have been modified, but are the same length and without any metadata changes (like mtime) will not be considered "changed" during a subsequent incremental backup. Currently, only ext2/3 volumes can be backed up (this limitation may be removed in an upcoming release). ACLs and extended attributes are NOT tracked.

The slice version is: http://www.slicehost.com/questions/#backups

Re:Disk Performance: Linode vs. Slicehost by jedsmith on Monday July 05, 2010 @06:09PM (#1489250)
Linode's backup system includes a snapshot which can be triggered whenever you like, as well as the scheduled incremental backups.

The UI looks like this: http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/3251/linodebackups.png