What is the problem with confirming the leanings of the organization just before you are going to comment about completely disagreeing with the article's characterization?

If the article mentions that "Senator X of the pro-life camp said ..." you answer the quiz question with "X" (because it's an indisputable fact that the article calls X pro-life) and then you are free to comment how "pro-life" is a biased term, or that X is a shill for Y who supported murdering babies in the past, or whatever.

You don't have to agree with the article's stance to know how to answer the questions, you just have to know what the article's stance is.