News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Incredible shrinking airline seat by jessriedel on Saturday July 29, 2017 @02:49PM (#14882488)
With 3 million flights a year in the US, there's no way the cost is possibly justified by any reasonable cost-benefit analysis.

> Nobody died in a crash of a United States-certificated scheduled airline operating anywhere in the world in 2016...it is the seventh straight year that nobody died in a crash on a United States-certificated scheduled airline operating anywhere in the world.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danielreed/2016/12/28/in-the-la...

Re:Incredible shrinking airline seat by GordonS on Saturday July 29, 2017 @02:57PM (#14882515)
How often do planes actually crash? Is it often enough to get statisically significant data about survival rates in the event of an evacuation?

Also, evacuation after a crash is not the only safety issue - there is deep vein thrombosis, for example.

Re:Incredible shrinking airline seat by jessriedel on Saturday July 29, 2017 @03:29PM (#14882672)
There isn't nearly enough real-crash data for something as specific as seat widths, but the FAA gets lots of info about this stuff by simulating evacuation procedures with real people.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/20...

Re:Incredible shrinking airline seat by obsurveyor on Saturday July 29, 2017 @02:58PM (#14882523)
All the more reason to do research into making sure there isn't a safety issue here. Stats like this just make people and companies complacent until the next tragedy strikes.
Re:Incredible shrinking airline seat by jessriedel on Saturday July 29, 2017 @03:25PM (#14882653)
Research isn't free. It's very possible an order of magnitude estimate would show that the risks of seat narrowing couldn't possibly outweigh the benefits.