Re:First Human Embryos Edited in U.S
by hipjiveguy on Friday July 28, 2017 @09:59PM
(#14879092)
well the answer of course is to let some greater intelligence decide this for you. Something greater than humans. AI? Let data and algorithms that aren't influenced by emotions decide?
I'm not denying science, and how it improves the human condition. But this is the point when it stops improving the human condition, and improves the controlled human condition. not the same thing.
Even assuming that this works, when you do that, you immediately run into the same problem as every other eugenics program: you are reducing the diversity of the population to seek a local maximum. In the analogy for optimization problems of the cows in the field standing on hills and in valleys, you're having all the cows stand on a single hill. You improve the current fitness of the population, according to your metrics, at the cost of the future fitness - you'll never find higher hills to stand upon, and if the fitness function changes, your population will be less equipped to handle it.