Re:Metaclasses: Thoughts on generative C++
by misil on Friday July 28, 2017 @03:41AM
(#14872654)
>catch up to Rust
This proposal has nothing whatsoever to do about any Rust feature. It's about compile-time metaprogramming on steroids.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Metaclasses: Thoughts on generative C++
by steveklabnik on Friday July 28, 2017 @10:36AM
(#14874530)
It is similar to several Rust features, but has its differences, as you'd expect. They're also in-development features, so I agree that "catching up to Rust" feels like a bad way to frame this.