News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sci-Hub’s cache of pirated papers is so big, subscription... by dmix on Thursday July 27, 2017 @07:29PM (#14870681)
So for your service 26TB * 0.044 USD/Gigabyte = $1144/month to host all the Scihub data

Quite a big fee :p

Re:Sci-Hub’s cache of pirated papers is so big, subscription... by kobeya on Thursday July 27, 2017 @09:34PM (#14871227)
That seems rediculously cheap and easy to come up with funds for. Storing the entire progress of science for $1k/mo? That's a good deal.
Re:Sci-Hub’s cache of pirated papers is so big, subscription... by dmix on Thursday July 27, 2017 @10:31PM (#14871472)
True, a low grade ICO for SciHub, backing an multi-country IPFS store with a decent web interface on top could raise that money easily. You could create a mini forum/social network around it for commenting on papers. Buying a coin to make an account or freemium buying a 'VIP' accounts ala Dribbble...maybe even a DocumentCloud style annotation system, so it has some self-sustaining business model other than raising initial capital.

Although I don't know much about creating 'DApps' or how Ethereum or IPFS works or what SciHub contains beyond a primitive grasp [1], just sayin :p

[1] I watched a video of a talk "Distributed Apps with IPFS (Juan Benet) - Full Stack Fest 2016" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jONZtXMu03w

Re:Sci-Hub’s cache of pirated papers is so big, subscription... by kobeya on Friday July 28, 2017 @09:41PM (#14879043)
Why does everything have to be an ICO? What's the point of a token here? Just give the appropriate organization some charitable funds.
Re:Sci-Hub’s cache of pirated papers is so big, subscription... by mythrwy on Thursday July 27, 2017 @10:06PM (#14871358)
That's one way to look at it.

Another is 13 2TB drives at $70 a pop. May run into some network congestion sharing however :)