News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on AMD Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 3 1200 CPU Review. Parent comment

Re:AMD Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 3 1200 CPU Review by IanCutress on Thursday July 27, 2017 @04:55PM (#14869419)
AnandTech runs a Chrome Compile benchmark in every review under the office benchmarks section.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/11550/the-intel-skylakex-revie...

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/CPU/1857

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AMD Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 3 1200 CPU Review by srcmap on Friday July 28, 2017 @01:59PM (#14876179)
Chrome compilation should be heavily parallelized. (It is my core use case. I only care about system big project compilation speed. )

The report seems to show Intel 4C/8T is doing better than AMD 8C/16T with much bigger L2/L3 cache config.

Is 7700K really that good? Can anyone from AMD explain this?

Intel (Kaby Lake) Core i7 7700K (91W, $339) 4C/8T, 4.2 GHz, 1MB L2, 8MB L3 17.81

AMD (Zen) Ryzen 7 1800X (95W, $499) 8C/16T, 3.6 GHz, 4MB L2, 16MB L3 16.32

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AMD Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 3 1200 CPU Review by cbcoutinho on Thursday July 27, 2017 @06:10PM (#14870100)
Wow that was fast and exactly what I meant. Thanks again
[ Parent | on HN ]