News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter Fails to Grow Its Audience Again by recursive on Thursday July 27, 2017 @01:26PM (#14867459)
Counterpoint: I can easily understand the treading on HN. Whenever I see a threaded conversation on twitter, I cannot tell what is a response to what. I'm not sure if threaded is even the right word, but you used it first.

For instance: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/49800848655150694...

There are a ton of replies to things, but I can't tell where anything fits logically.

Re:Twitter Fails to Grow Its Audience Again by Karunamon on Thursday July 27, 2017 @08:19PM (#14870953)
Basically you're looking at a flattened tree. Anytime you see the lines, those are part of the same conversation sequentially. Once the lines stop, that's a new conversation.

http://i.imgur.com/02mm3YW.png

And an ASCII version:

    Tweet
    -----
    1.0 Reply to tweet
    |
    1.1 Reply to 1.0
    |
    1.2 Reply to 1.1
    ----
    2.0 Reply to tweet
    |
    2.1 Reply to 2.0
    |
    2.2 Reply to 2.1
    ---
    3.0 Reply to tweet
Re:Twitter Fails to Grow Its Audience Again by recursive on Friday July 28, 2017 @12:03PM (#14875240)
So where does a reply to 1.1 go?
Re:Twitter Fails to Grow Its Audience Again by Karunamon on Friday July 28, 2017 @02:32PM (#14876439)
Right where 1.2 is. If you wanted to see the direct responses to that, you'd click on that tweet, and then be looking at a new subthread. It's all predicated on whose message the reply-er clicked the reply button on.

    First Tweet
      Reply 1
      Reply 2 <-- click


    Reply 1
      Reply 1.1
      Reply 1.2
You only see the first two levels of the main tweet you're looking at. The first tweet, its replies, and the immediate children of those replies. Some indenting would make this a lot more intuitive.
Re:Twitter Fails to Grow Its Audience Again by recursive on Friday July 28, 2017 @04:12PM (#14877161)
That is basically my complaint then. I have 1920 horizontal pixels available, but for some reason twitter is intent on only using a small fraction of that.