Re:How Chrome OS, Termux, YubiKey and Duo Mobile make for gr...
by cjsuk on Thursday July 27, 2017 @07:40AM
(#14864299)
Yubikeys tend to wear out your USB ports after a bit I found, at least on my X201 and the X61 that preceded it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How Chrome OS, Termux, YubiKey and Duo Mobile make for gr...
by falcolas on Thursday July 27, 2017 @09:22AM
(#14864965)
Any port used frequently will wear out - they have limited life spans due to the moving parts. I see it with my external display ports pretty frequently.
One potential solution is a USB hub, or even a USB extension cable you keep plugged in.
Re:How Chrome OS, Termux, YubiKey and Duo Mobile make for gr...
by concede_pluto on Thursday July 27, 2017 @01:21PM
(#14867406)
I seem to remember reading that NASA would use short sacrificial extension cables so that ground tests would certify the jacks they'd be flying but not wear them out.
Re:How Chrome OS, Termux, YubiKey and Duo Mobile make for gr...
by j_s on Thursday July 27, 2017 @09:53AM
(#14865221)
Yubikey NEO NFC!
Re:How Chrome OS, Termux, YubiKey and Duo Mobile make for gr...
by ardaozkal on Thursday July 27, 2017 @10:23AM
(#14865522)
My main issue with neo is that it doesn't have 4096 bit pgp support, unlike yubikey 4 and 4 nano.
Re:How Chrome OS, Termux, YubiKey and Duo Mobile make for gr...
by cjsuk on Thursday July 27, 2017 @09:40AM
(#14865111)
Or use Duo's mobile app which has no mechanical parts!
Re:How Chrome OS, Termux, YubiKey and Duo Mobile make for gr...
by ardaozkal on Thursday July 27, 2017 @10:25AM
(#14865553)
The reason people use u2f keys is because they can't be cloned and the key can't be extracted. I too like and use TOTP (with Authy), but it really can't beat specialized hardware.
Re:How Chrome OS, Termux, YubiKey and Duo Mobile make for gr...
by cjsuk on Friday July 28, 2017 @04:05AM
(#14872761)
I agree entirely. However I'm willing to trade off convenience on this.
Re:How Chrome OS, Termux, YubiKey and Duo Mobile make for gr...
by kasey_junk on Thursday July 27, 2017 @10:24AM
(#14865551)
Thats not U2F though right?