News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IPv6 Adoption by mrkrabo on Wednesday July 26, 2017 @07:19AM (#14855225)
It's the same as in IPv4.

If the user has a static IP address, in IPv4 you ban a /32 (i.e., one address, his own). In IPv6 you'd have to ban the entire range allocated to the user, usually a /64. (edited)

If the user has a dynamic IP address, well, you're on your own. :D

Re:IPv6 Adoption by detaro on Wednesday July 26, 2017 @07:22AM (#14855236)
A /32 in IPv6 often is an entire provider, so that's not a good idea. A /64 is the closest to a single IPv4 address, (although some providers give each customer a /56 or so, for creating subnets).
Re:IPv6 Adoption by Symbiote on Wednesday July 26, 2017 @07:48AM (#14855359)
With CG-NAT on IPv4, banning a v6 /64 is no worse than banning an v4 /32.