I think GP is simply implying that, since "a woman rarely gains from making allegations, either true or false", she doesn't have a strong incentive to make false accusations. Which is IMO a fair explanation, though personally I disagree with the assumption here. The way sexual harassment is treated these days, even a vague false accusation is a very powerful weapon. Hell, even a threat of an accusation is a powerful weapon.

Sorry to interrupt your little men-only discussion "women: willing victim or scheming accuser?".

But did any of you notice that the alleged false accuser in this case is actually a man?

I'm pretty sure everyone here did, but this particular subthread diverged to a tangential topic, which is normal.