News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Docker Abstraction That Handles Container Security by pmontra on Wednesday July 26, 2017 @02:39AM (#14854064)
I decided to try nanobox last Friday, after some troubles with firing up a Vagrant box on my laptop. One instance worked, another one didn't, nothing new...

Unfortunately I realized that to download nanobox I have to register and login and I really don't understand why. I expected to be able to download a binary, write a configuration file and build my service which I'll never run on somebody's else cloud.

So this is not equivalent to Vagrant or docker, which are unregistered downloads or even apt-gets. It's more like running a part of AWS locally in development, but I don't want any lockin for this project.

I went back to Vagrant. It turned out that a halt of the failed box followed by an up fixed the problem. I still don't feel Vagrant to be completely reliable or reproducible but I'll write my docker-compose and Dockerfiles if I want to use something else.

I'd love to hear from nanobox about the reasons for the required registration. Not having to support people like me that won't buy their service would be perfectly fine. I wonder if there is some technical reason that applies also to the basic scenario of firing up a service locally.

There are no comments on this comment yet.