Re:How Fear and Outrage Are Sold for Profit
by seanwilson on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @10:42PM
(#14853356)
I agree with you. Obviously I'm against manipulative, deceptive and obnoxious advertising but it's beneficial to consumers and companies for consumers to find out about new products through ads that will save them time, save them money, be enjoyable etc.
It doesn't seem realistic at all to me that someone would invest piles of money into a product that solved a problem people didn't know they have or significantly improves on an existing product where you're only route to communicate this with customers would be to ask for reviews, hope that your target market actively looks for reviews and hope word of mouth spreads.
Don't we hear all the time on hackernews about how building a great product isn't enough if you don't have a marketing strategy?
I find it hard how you can disagree with ads for entertainment especially. Why would you be against knowing a sequel to a movie or game you like but don't actively follow just came out?
There must be some happy middle ground between obnoxious privacy invading ads and no ads at all.
It doesn't seem realistic at all to me that someone would invest piles of money into a product that solved a problem people didn't know they have or significantly improves on an existing product where you're only route to communicate this with customers would be to ask for reviews, hope that your target market actively looks for reviews and hope word of mouth spreads.
Don't we hear all the time on hackernews about how building a great product isn't enough if you don't have a marketing strategy?
I find it hard how you can disagree with ads for entertainment especially. Why would you be against knowing a sequel to a movie or game you like but don't actively follow just came out?
There must be some happy middle ground between obnoxious privacy invading ads and no ads at all.