That's what I do anyway, I'm much happier for it.
There is a problem in curation / moderation though. Who do you trust with correcting headlines? The public, with voting? Easily manipulated still.
Another problem this doesn't correct is the selection of what events to report on. To use an example from the article, terrorism would still dominate your news feed.
Or for clickbait science headlines immediately report the statistical significance of the cited paper/credibility of journal based on the number of citations that journal recieves from other scientists.
Some types of articles would be tougher than others for sure but that doesn't mean we couldn't grab at the low hanging fruit.
Such things started forming on YouTube (with some problematic elements) but were defunded with an eye towards attracting more old media ad money.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfHXXV45EjE
Phillip DeFranco isn't perfect, but he's graduated from YouTube punk to what passes as a "moderate" there. (I think he's a good way to keep track of the middle of opinion in new media there.) He's also decided to start his own online news network.
Will it ever happen? If not will the economic repercussions leave us with a decent world or some kind of dystopia?