News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elon Musk’s Tunnel Plan Isn’t as Crazy as SpaceX or Tesla by jws on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @01:00PM (#14849484)
It may be time to legislate the concept of "tunnel space". This would be similar to air space. In the US a property owner doesn't control the air above their land (subject to details). Maybe Congress should declare the Earth below say 100' as not controlled by the land owner and allocated by some new agency, say the Federal Crust Administration.

Remove all of this from state, county, and municipal jurisdiction. Centralize the rules. Local government will still be controlling the portals where it must surface and interact with the surface world.

This will have to merge with mineral rights, but the intersection of mass transit and mining is minimal.

Re:Elon Musk’s Tunnel Plan Isn’t as Crazy as SpaceX or Tesla by kbenson on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @01:11PM (#14849598)
Every mining company will lobby against that. It's probably easier to do it with easements and eminent domain.
Re:Elon Musk’s Tunnel Plan Isn’t as Crazy as SpaceX or Tesla by bpodgursky on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @01:27PM (#14849829)
This concept already does exist, and is used by mining companies, so no they won't lobby against it. There are a lot of cities in Pennsylvania with coal mines a mile underneath them.
Re:Elon Musk’s Tunnel Plan Isn’t as Crazy as SpaceX or Tesla by dragonwriter on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @02:24PM (#14850475)
> This concept already does exist,

No, it doesn't. You are confusing the severability and frequent separate sale of mineral rights to a federalization of all subterranean property.