Re:Fear is America’s top-selling consumer product
by komali2 on Monday July 24, 2017 @10:37PM
(#14844664)
I believe I tried dan Carlin but was turned off when he made the argument that a third party vote is a wasted vote.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Fear is America’s top-selling consumer product
by turnspike on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @01:49AM
(#14845398)
Dan's saying that the political machine is so rigged that it's very difficult for a third party to succeed. He gets right down into the gory details of the electoral system, it's eye opening.
Re:Fear is America’s top-selling consumer product
by dude01 on Monday July 24, 2017 @11:03PM
(#14844790)
You probably caught him at a bad time. He's also argued that third parties are the only way forward in America (which I think is not true). At this point, his Common Sense podcast is somewhat repetitive of his previous stuff, but he's trying to say new things each time, which is tough.
His Hardcore History stuff, on the other hand, is mind-blowingly awesome!!! And not repetitive.
Re:Fear is America’s top-selling consumer product
by ouid on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @01:59AM
(#14845452)
convincing someone to waste their vote is a powerful tool.
Re:Fear is America’s top-selling consumer product
by mikeash on Monday July 24, 2017 @10:58PM
(#14844765)
In what way is it not? I'm a firm believer that the two-party system sucks and we need electoral reform to make third parties viable, and every time I vote I wish it were already so... but there's no escaping the reality that the system, as it is built today, makes third-party votes as useful as drawing a spaceship on your ballot.
Re:Fear is America’s top-selling consumer product
by colejohnson66 on Monday July 24, 2017 @11:59PM
(#14845025)
BECAUSE people believe that. If everyone who wanted to vote third party actually voted third party, they’d actually stand a chance.
Re:Fear is America’s top-selling consumer product
by mikeash on Tuesday July 25, 2017 @10:58AM
(#14848177)
Because the nature of the system makes it unstable with more than two viable parties. It is possible for a third party to attain a critical mass and become viable, but it would displace one of the current major parties and we'd be back to a two-party system.