Re:Bento, a pythonic packaging solution for Python software
by mkramlich on Saturday July 03, 2010 @01:24PM
(#1484078)
anybody used it? any sense of whether it's better than alternatives?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bento, a pythonic packaging solution for Python software
by cdavid on Tuesday July 06, 2010 @04:52PM
(#1492341)
I don't think you should use just now (it is marked as experimental quick clearly :) ). As for the advantages:
- support for arbitrary installation scheme, like autoconf (e.g. you don't have to hardcode installation path to install data as with distutils)
- data files are easier to deal with
- even though it is really raw, the internal tool to build C extensions has automatic dependency handling, md5-based coutent change detection, and supports parallel builds.
- it is designed to be hackable. I want to be able to use scons or waf to build complex extensions (I am coming from numpy/scipy, which has particularly strong needs for building C extensions compared to the average python library)