News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Multi-Sig Hack: A Postmortem by bitmapbrother on Saturday July 22, 2017 @01:42AM (#14825599)
Is Haskell or ML 100% secure and not prone to bugs? The original multi-sig wallet code did not contain the error. It was only when Parity refactored it did they introduce the error. Sure, it would have been nice had Solidity not defaulted functions to public, but the error was the fault of a human and not the language. That said, I agree with their recommendations that functions not default to public and the use of simple contracts encapsulating complex contracts.
Re:The Multi-Sig Hack: A Postmortem by zengid on Saturday July 22, 2017 @02:12AM (#14825692)
No, not inherently more secure, but probably more developers around who already understand the core semantics. Also, tools.