Re:The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs
by vit05 on Friday July 21, 2017 @11:14PM
(#14825191)
That's because the bookmarkers sucks. They do not adapt to what you are doing, you need to do a lot of setup and organize a lot to be able to use it well. It should be more organic, grow with the use you make. I still believe that anyone who makes a better bookmark will dominate more than just the browser war.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs
by _wmd on Saturday July 22, 2017 @02:07AM
(#14825676)
Bookmarking always struck me as a 90s solution to just having fulltext search and analytics over your browser history, there have been a few attempts at browsers that addressed this head-on, but they've all died off over time
IMO just one good new tab UI over a user's history/local cache could make a sizeable dent in Google's ad revenue
Re:The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs
by bigbugbag on Saturday July 22, 2017 @06:55AM
(#14826511)
Opera with its unique cache offered the option to have full text search in history and it was great. Then quarterly profit became a priority for the board and they dropped their browser to become a google chrome advanced skin.
Re:The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs
by JetSpiegel on Saturday July 22, 2017 @08:12AM
(#14826794)
It's not like you have to reinvent the wheel even, just use Xapian like notmuch to do the grunt work of full-text indexing.
Re:The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs
by gkya on Saturday July 22, 2017 @04:19AM
(#14826008)
How do you organise tabs then? I've god knows how many bookmarks and I've been blindly Ctrl-D-ing since time immemorial, only tagging very distinct stuff and modifying titles if too stupid. When I need to get at sth. bookmarked, typing stuff into the url field in firefox just works.
Re:The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs
by sweden on Saturday July 22, 2017 @06:20AM
(#14826371)
Tree Tab Style.
Try it, then read the original post and the comments again. :)
I think this is the missing piece on all this discussion.
Re:The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs
by gkya on Saturday July 22, 2017 @06:45AM
(#14826452)
I do know those extensions, but still prefer bookmarks. I just tag stuff unread and go on.
Re:The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs
by bigbugbag on Saturday July 22, 2017 @06:56AM
(#14826516)
then link rot and unread stays unread forever.
Re:The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs
by gkya on Saturday July 22, 2017 @07:33AM
(#14826659)
Well. I've made a little extension that lists unread links. For linkrot, yes that's an issue I plan to solve, and what I will do is I'll either find or write a program that saves my bookmarks as websaves.
Re:The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs
by raesene2 on Saturday July 22, 2017 @03:45AM
(#14825909)
Have you tried pocket? I used to keep a load of bookmarks but the problem was that after a while many of the source urls would die off. So something like pocket is very handy as it takes a copy of the page you're interested in.
Re:The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs
by bigbugbag on Saturday July 22, 2017 @06:24AM
(#14826391)
Why pocket when we have opensource wallabag that you can either host yourself[1] or use as a service[2] ?
IIRC pocket has had some serious vulnerabilites exposed.
Re:The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs
by gnicholas on Saturday July 22, 2017 @11:09AM
(#14827557)
Pocket might get better integration since it was recently acquired by Mozilla. Fingers crossed...
Re:The New Firefox and Ridiculous Numbers of Tabs
by kasabali on Thursday July 27, 2017 @01:14PM
(#14867343)
Pocket had a great integration with Firefox when it was an extension. Then they decided to integrate it into the browser and ironically it end up being a piece of shit that was not more functional than a bookmarklet. Not only that but they also removed the original extension from add-ons site so you have had to use the half assed built-in implementation.