News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Decline of Investment in San Francisco Startups by kevinburke on Friday July 21, 2017 @12:57AM (#14818172)
A house in Tahoe you use 3 weeks a year is not really rental stock, and it's not clear what benefit the public gets from your 2nd home that would justify a tax subsidy
Re:The Decline of Investment in San Francisco Startups by epistasis on Friday July 21, 2017 @01:14AM (#14818222)
With VRBO and other sharing apps, yes that house in Tahoe is rental stock.
Re:The Decline of Investment in San Francisco Startups by zorpner on Friday July 21, 2017 @01:21AM (#14818244)
Short-term rentals aren't housing.
Re:The Decline of Investment in San Francisco Startups by epistasis on Friday July 21, 2017 @01:32AM (#14818279)
Yes, they are, but short-term, and it takes longer-term housing off the market. This is ravaging the housing markets of many mountain villages.

Re-reading the comment I was originally replying to, the commenter might have meant that the 2nd home didn't justify a tax deduction, which I would most definitely agree with. A 2nd home is an investment, and there should be no tax incentives on that sort of investment.

Re:The Decline of Investment in San Francisco Startups by hkmurakami on Friday July 21, 2017 @02:24AM (#14818462)
Well in the states, a first home is already often a person's biggest investment.
Re:The Decline of Investment in San Francisco Startups by m-j-fox on Saturday July 22, 2017 @09:41AM (#14827149)
Sure, but in silicon valley one thing to do with your smalltime IPO winnings is buy a house and rent out your old one to someone who has yet to hit paydirt. Maybe part of what pushes prices up, but I like to think my renters are getting a better deal than they would from old-man Irvine. (The incentives to play this game are razor-thin, mostly down to tax advantages.)