Almost all of my team has individual subscriptions to sharelatex because we felt it was better from a books perspective to show there is more individual interest in an open source solution than corporate interest. We specifically chose sharelatex instead of overleaf so we could host our own instance. We've largely moved away from using sharelatex but still keep our subscriptions active as a form of support for continued development.

I hope what you say is true about the commitment to open source.

Thanks storrgie -- I'd like to echo James' point (in his reply to pfooti) that this is very much two teams coming together to build on each others strengths, and we see the open source aspect of ShareLaTeX as an important part of that.

That's a nice decision. Thanks for committing to it so quickly in public. Props.

Good luck with the product merge. Don't wreck it with complexity :)

OverLeaf user here. Thank you. It's awesome.

Me too, it's awesome indeed, not sure we could have collaborated without it. Many thanks.