News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scientists Reverse Brain Damage in Drowned Toddler? by tptacek on Thursday July 20, 2017 @12:19PM (#14813787)
Wait, he didn't say "this link says there's no such thing as dry drowning". He said he was told to take his daughter to the doctor over suspected dry drowning, actually did so, and the doctor got upset because there's no such thing as dry drowning.

His doctor contradicted you, and the advice you gave at the end of your comment. Are you also a doctor?

Re:Scientists Reverse Brain Damage in Drowned Toddler? by darkerside on Thursday July 20, 2017 @05:43PM (#14816565)
I implicitly trust most of what I hear from a doctor, even when it defies intuition. But I have much less trust for what I hear secondhand, i.e. when someone says "my doctor said". There's simply too great a likelihood for signal corruption along the way. Patients can fail to communicate context to their doctors, miss subtleties in the communication back, and fail to relay context once again when they relate their stories to other lay folk. And no, I am not a doctor :)
Re:Scientists Reverse Brain Damage in Drowned Toddler? by gerbilly on Thursday July 20, 2017 @02:36PM (#14815149)
Actually his doctor is mostly right, however dry drowning can occur, but only from immersion in dihydrogen monoxide.