Re:In Urban China, Cash Is Rapidly Becoming Obsolete
by nicky0 on Monday July 17, 2017 @04:55AM
(#14786713)
The article you linked to states that 59% of Americans always or usually pay off the full amount each month.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:In Urban China, Cash Is Rapidly Becoming Obsolete
by MichaelBurge on Monday July 17, 2017 @05:52AM
(#14786981)
To me, "most" implies "at least 95%". That's because it's used to exclude a possibility: If most programming languages have if statements, then if I hear about your new language I can assume it has if statements without checking further.
To use a simple majority means that you'd have to accept a simple statement like "Most programmers use Javascript"[1], and that's too weak to use for any reasoning.
[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20160317205014/http://stackoverf...
Re:In Urban China, Cash Is Rapidly Becoming Obsolete
by lallysingh on Monday July 17, 2017 @08:02AM
(#14787681)
> To me, "most" implies "at least 95%".
Re:In Urban China, Cash Is Rapidly Becoming Obsolete
by matz1 on Monday July 17, 2017 @09:02AM
(#14788066)
No, it can also mean more than half.
Re:In Urban China, Cash Is Rapidly Becoming Obsolete
by MichaelBurge on Monday July 17, 2017 @10:22AM
(#14788708)
I asked a few friends how they use the word, and apparently there are people that use it to mean "nearly all" and people that use it to mean "more than half", and the first group doesn't realize the second group exists.
This paper[1] gives a couple interpretations, none of which are as strict as the one I use. I wonder if I mixed up "conversational implicatures" with a heuristic for logical implication.
In any case, I've apparently been wrong about the meaning of a basic English word my whole life, and I can't find a good cover story to hide the mistake.
[1] http://www.zas.gwz-berlin.de/fileadmin/mitarbeiter/solt/Most...