Re:Australian PM Calls for End-To-End Encryption Ban
by kakarot on Sunday July 16, 2017 @02:12PM
(#14783313)
Were you unhappy with the fact that no one felt like arguing with your reply to SpaceManiac, so you're trying again?
The scenario you presented, client <-> server, has nothing to do with wisty's original statement,
"As I understand it, it means banning end to end communication between clients. So you can chat over https, but only if the server in the middle (which can be served warrants) is doing the encryption."
which is client <-> server <-> client, and is completely irrelevant. You are changing the definition to client <-> server. Think about it.
The scenario you presented, client <-> server, has nothing to do with wisty's original statement,
"As I understand it, it means banning end to end communication between clients. So you can chat over https, but only if the server in the middle (which can be served warrants) is doing the encryption."
which is client <-> server <-> client, and is completely irrelevant. You are changing the definition to client <-> server. Think about it.