Re:Universal Jinja: a crazy idea for a Python-ready front end
by aepc on Saturday July 15, 2017 @06:26PM
(#14779370)
The templates used in web2py felt good. Dont know what happened to web2py?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Universal Jinja: a crazy idea for a Python-ready front end
by shakna on Sunday July 16, 2017 @10:43AM
(#14782161)
web2py let arbitrary code be called by the client, and its failsafes were full of holes. So it fell out of favour.
Re:Universal Jinja: a crazy idea for a Python-ready front end
by glimmung on Friday July 21, 2017 @04:44AM
(#14819008)
That's just nonsense - source?
Re:Universal Jinja: a crazy idea for a Python-ready front end
by shakna on Friday July 21, 2017 @05:02PM
(#14823740)
Handful of open CVEs in Debian. [0]
The brute-forceable admin happened around the time web2py and Django devs started having a few arguments online, like this one [1], which didn't exactly paint web2py in a good light.
[0] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/w...
[1] https://www.quora.com/Is-web2py-a-good-Python-web-framework