News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Australian PM Calls for End-To-End Encryption Ban by Retric on Saturday July 15, 2017 @10:17AM (#14776711)
You assume it's obvious when something is encrypted. Steganography is generally easier with encrypted messages as it looks random.
Re:Australian PM Calls for End-To-End Encryption Ban by astrobe_ on Saturday July 15, 2017 @12:29PM (#14777465)
Indeed, unless the traffic/file is explicitly labeled as encrypted (protocol, file header etc.) I think there's no way to tell if a particular piece of data is encrypted or not.

More generally, the incredible stupidity in those calls for encryption bans is that the "bad guys" will abide to the law. There's a dark market for botnets etc., so why not for custom stealth encryption tools? I wouldn't be surprised if it already exists.

Re:Australian PM Calls for End-To-End Encryption Ban by fantispug on Saturday July 15, 2017 @11:29AM (#14777132)
That's a very good point; even if it's possible to detect steganography of encrypted messages it's probably expensive to do so, especially in the torrent of digital traffic online.

I guess it will only impact law abiding citizens then.