Re:Toward Go 2
by masklinn on Friday July 14, 2017 @06:14AM
(#14768728)
> I still do not understand why this cannot be done via a Variant type.
Makes little difference, either way you need a magical type since it has to allow any method call at compile time, and then requires enough RTTI that it can check for and dispatch method calls at runtime. Whether you call it Variant or dynamic has no relevance.
Makes little difference, either way you need a magical type since it has to allow any method call at compile time, and then requires enough RTTI that it can check for and dispatch method calls at runtime. Whether you call it Variant or dynamic has no relevance.