News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Toward Go 2 by concede_pluto on Thursday July 13, 2017 @11:36PM (#14767254)
It's also strange that a language that wants to encourage parallelism requires for loops, and specifies that they always run sequentially. Java 8 can put map/reduce with a thread pool in the standard library precisely because it doesn't use a for loop; imagine how tedious and repetitive the Go version would be: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/collections/streams/...
Re:Toward Go 2 by Sharlin on Friday July 14, 2017 @03:30AM (#14768180)
To be fair, I don't think Go prioritizes parallelism as much as it does concurrency.