News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NASA admits it doesn’t have the funding to land humans on... by maxxxxx on Thursday July 13, 2017 @10:29AM (#14761521)
Yeah. You can see it two ways: The SLS is an embarrassment or an admission by Congress that they don't care at all about spaceflight.
Re:NASA admits it doesn’t have the funding to land humans on... by gozur88 on Thursday July 13, 2017 @12:36PM (#14762729)
It's absolutely the latter. Congress has never really cared about spaceflight - to your Congressman it's just an opportunity to bring federal dollars to his district, because that will get him reelected.
Re:NASA admits it doesn’t have the funding to land humans on... by digikata on Thursday July 13, 2017 @04:22PM (#14764834)
But why not make real plans and actually get something accomplished, then you can point to something truly concrete during re-election, and even bump the funding even more.
Re:NASA admits it doesn’t have the funding to land humans on... by gozur88 on Friday July 14, 2017 @01:51PM (#14771739)
The money you get from contractors for reelection is going to help more than anything you can actually point to. House seats are up every two years, and you don't accomplish much in aerospace in two years.
Re:NASA admits it doesn’t have the funding to land humans on... by maxxxxx on Thursday July 13, 2017 @04:34PM (#14764926)
And if you want to push money to your districts make sure it's useful.